OrbitalHub

For twenty years, every byte of data sent home from the surface of Mars has ridden a UHF radio piggyback on a science orbiter that happened to be passing overhead. On 2 September 2026 NASA ended that arrangement. The agency announced that Blue Origin will design, build, launch, and operate a dedicated Mars Telecommunications Orbiter under a firm-fixed-price contract worth up to $700 million, with delivery by the end of 2028 and full operations at the red planet in 2030 (NASA news release, 2 Sep 2026). For the first time since the cancelled 2005 Mars Telecommunications Orbiter, NASA is buying communications capacity at Mars the way it buys launch services from SpaceX: a fixed commercial price for a working spacecraft, with the operator running the show.

The award is small in dollar terms compared to flagship planetary missions and large in strategic terms. It formalizes the commercial-services model that has reshaped cislunar space and applies it 1.4 astronomical units farther out. It puts the first dedicated deep-space relay at a planet, not at the Moon. And it gives Blue Origin — eight years after New Shepard reached the Kármán line — a planetary-scale role that no other company has held.

Every rover since Sojourner has paid a tax for its bandwidth. The UHF Electra relay on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter tops out near one megabit per second, and that link is shared with instruments the orbiter was actually launched to run (Edwards et al., 2003). The Deep Space Network's direct X-band uplink is even thinner — a single HiRISE frame takes 1.5 hours at MRO's 5.2 Mb/s peak (JPL, "Deep Space Communications," 2017). Perseverance's plume telemetry, Ingenuity's flight logs, the trace-gas measurements from ExoMars TGO — all of it competes for slots in orbits selected to do science, not to be comms towers.

A purpose-built relay changes the calculus. Operators can schedule lander passes against an orbit designed for continuous visibility, freed from the geometry of a science primary mission. Layer a deep-space optical terminal on top — analogous to the Deep Space Optical Communications package Psyche has been flight-qualifying since 2023 — and the link budget explodes. DSOC pushed 267 Mb/s from 31 million kilometers in late 2023 and held a link to 467 million kilometers in July 2024 (JPL, 11 Dec 2023; NASA, 25 Apr 2024).

The second-order effect is what NASA gets to stop doing. SCaN has been forced for two decades to add relay payloads to every Mars science orbiter as a tax for participating. Stripping that out frees mass, power, and cost on the next generation of orbiters — a meaningful simplification when the Mars Sample Return architecture is still being rebuilt and human Mars exploration sits on NASA's stated timeline.

NASA's request for proposals went out in May 2026, drawn up under procurement authority inserted by the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which explicitly allocated $700 million for the orbiter. The Act's wording tied the procurement to companies that had previously received Mars Sample Return study money and pitched a telecom element as part of those studies — eight firms in total: Aerojet Rocketdyne, Blue Origin, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Quantum Space, Rocket Lab, SpaceX, and Whittinghill Aerospace. The competitive field narrowed quickly. The award names Blue Origin as prime, with no public teaming structure disclosed.

Blue Origin owns the full stack: bus, telecom payload, launch on its own New Glenn 7×2, trans-Mars injection, Mars orbit insertion, and operations. The published draft specification lists an areocentric orbit with a 180 km periareon and 4,500 km apoareon — a high-elliptical geometry that gives long dwell times over a fixed surface region while still clearing the atmosphere at the low end. New Glenn 7×2 has a trans-lunar capacity near 7 metric tons (NASA ELV Performance). The company has flown the vehicle successfully twice and failed once — the pad explosion that took LC-36A offline — so it will need to commission LC-36B or shift to Vandenberg to honor the 2028 commitment.

Behind the announcement is the same calculation that produced Commercial Lunar Payload Services and Human Landing System: in a budget environment where every Mars architecture decision is being fought between sample-return, human-exploration, and science advocates, the cheapest move is to buy the bits and let the science missions keep their mass margins.

The relay orbit is the design lever that makes everything else work. A 180 × 4,500 km areocentric orbit gives roughly 8 to 10 hours of continuous visibility over a fixed surface target per orbital period near 7.5 hours. Compared with the 250 km circular sunsynchronous science orbit flown by MRO, the relay geometry trades observation time for surface dwell time. The radio link uses UHF proximity at 390 to 450 MHz with the CCSDS Proximity-1 protocol stack — identical to what flies on MRO, MAVEN, ExoMars TGO, Curiosity, InSight, and Perseverance. Every Mars asset currently on the surface can fall back to the new relay with no hardware changes (Edwards, 2003).

The free-space loss for the UHF proximity leg is bounded by:

L_fs = (4 * pi * d * f / c)^2

At 400 MHz and a slant range of about 1,000 km, path loss lands near 158 dB — the reason surface antennas are low-gain whips and the orbiter carries the high-gain nadir-pointed Electra package. The Earth-return leg at X-band (8.4 GHz) and Ka-band (32 GHz) from Mars runs at roughly 261 dB and 281 dB of free-space loss. Closing a 1 Mb/s link to a 70 m DSN aperture at X-band requires an EIRP around 38 dBi — achievable with a 1.5 m steerable dish.

The optical path changes the math. At 1.55 μm and 1.4 AU, beam divergence dominates over L_fs. The angular beamwidth of a diffraction-limited 22 cm aperture is:

theta = 1.22 * lambda / D ≈ 8.6 microradians

At Mars-Earth range, that gives a beam footprint on Earth near 1,200 km — the same order as the DSOC ground footprint demonstrated in flight, which is why DSOC paired a 22 cm spacecraft telescope with a 5 m Hale-class ground receiver (JPL DSOC poster, 2014). A relay with both a UHF proximity payload for handoff and an optical Earth-return payload for bulk data could push daily return into the terabit range, an order of magnitude over today's network.

The contract also stress-tests the fixed-price model at interplanetary distances. NASA's answer was to make the procurement compatible with commercial commsat buses — Blue Origin is expected to leverage a scaled Blue Ring platform — and to define the service in throughput and availability terms, not hardware specifications. The bet is that a commercial GEO production line can be retooled for an areocentric relay without a bespoke NASA-only factory.

The Mars Telecommunications Orbiter was proposed in 2004, cancelled in 2005, rediscovered in 2018 as NeMO, stalled in 2025, and finally contracted 21 years later. If Blue Origin hits the December 2028 delivery date, its 2030 arrival will coincide with a Mars surface far busier than the one Perseverance and Curiosity see today. Mars Sample Return needs continuous relay coverage during lander choreography. Human Mars missions need guaranteed high-bandwidth links that do not depend on a science orbiter being overhead.

The deeper story is that the relay architecture of the inner solar system is being privatized the way launch has been. The agency that built the Deep Space Network is handing its first dedicated relay at Mars to a commercial prime. The hardware questions are interesting; the procurement question is the one that will define the next twenty years.

Abstract

The blogpost explores relativistic effects on proof-of-work based cryptocurrency protocols. Cryptocurrencies are here to stay and it is quite plausible that future human colonists spread across the solar system and beyond will use a decentralized cryptocurrency as opposed to a fiat currency issued by a central authority. The low transaction fees, the ubiquitous access, not being bound by exchange rates or interest rates, not being controlled by financial institutions who are serving foreign interests -- these are some of the advantages cryptocurrencies will enjoy in the thriving exo-economy.

Motivation

At present, on a cryptocurrency network, the information exchanged by the nodes in the network reaches each node almost instantaneously. The speed at which the TCP/IP packets travel on the network and the fact that the Internet spans only the Earth and the LEO makes this possible. However, once the region the network is spread across will reach certain boundaries, the network size would have negative impact on the network: increasing communication failures due to network delays, more frequent and longer blockchain forks as part of the proof-of-work protocol, network segregation into local sub-networks (let us call them topological forks), just to name a few.

Nullius in verba... as they say. Let's go deeper into details and figure out a feasible solution for a truly interplanetary cryptocurrency.

Cryptocurrency 101

You can think of a cryptocurrency as a digital money ecosystem. Plain and simple. A collection of technologies are part of this ecosystem, all of them the result of years of research in the cryptography and distributed systems fields: a decentralized network of computers, a public transaction ledger -- also known as a blockchain, a protocol that consists of a set of rules for transaction validation, a decentralized consensus mechanism. [ANTO]

A decentralized network of computers ensures the resilience of the network. We can think of both computing power and data storage capabilities. As the computing power is distributed across the network, any disruption can be successfully handled by the network. Transaction data resides on all nodes of the network. This implies that even physical damage done to network nodes will not take out the network.

The blockchain is a public distributed ledger which stores all transactions handled by the network. As the name suggests, the blockchain is a list of data blocks. Each of these blocks contains a set of transactions, as many as can fit in the block, given the maximum size of the block (a characteristic of the network). Transactions contain sender and receiver info, and the amount/asset that is changing ownership, and they are broadcasted and added to blocks by network nodes. Blocks are linked to the previous block in the chain by a cryptographic hash (the hash of the previous block becomes part of the current block). This backward link leads all the way to the first block in the chain, the Genesis block. Each cryptocurrency blockchain has one. The cryptographic hashes have an important role in protecting the blockchain from tampering attempts.

The transaction validation rules enforced by the nodes in the network ensure that the content of each block in the blockchain is valid. By far, the most frequent form of fraud is double spending. The validation process makes sure that the inputs on the transactions exist and that they have not been already spent. The transactions marked as invalid are rejected by the network and do not make it on the blockchain.

The consensus mechanism is designed so that all the nodes in the network can agree on the set of transactions to be included in the current block. It shifts the authority and the credibility required by a central clearing house to a network of nodes. Important to mention here that, inherently, the nodes do not trust each other, and they do not have to because the trust is enforced by the consensus mechanism itself.

The Proof-of-Work

We mentioned above that one of the key innovations that make cryptocurrencies possible is the decentralized consensus mechanism. Currently, the de facto consensus mechanism is the proof-of-work.

The proof-of-work consensus mechanism was proposed by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2008 [NAKA]. In general, a proof-of-work is a piece of data that requires costly and time consuming computational effort, but it is very easy to verify. A very good analogy is one of your semester projects in college... it takes you a whole semester to finalize it, but it takes very little time and effort for your supervisor to evaluate and grade it. Similarly, proof-of-work is used by cryptocurrencies for block generation. For the network to accept the block, nodes must complete a proof-of-work which also guarantees the integrity of the transactions included in the block. The difficulty of the proof-of-work is adjusted by the network so that a new block can be generated every fixed time interval. This fixed time interval is characteristic to every cryptocurrency. Most notably, for Bitcoin this time interval is set to 10 minutes.

Satoshi Nakamoto's solution, emobodied by the proof-of-work algorithm above, achieves consensus on the network without a central trusted authority (hence the name decentralized consensus mechanism).

Enter the Ansible

For the astute reader, it is quite obvious at this point that communication delays between the network nodes have a direct effect on the protocol described above. An important assumption made when the protocol was designed is that these delays are small, and this is why they can be handled by the network when the nodes choose to follow and validate the blocks on the longest blockchain fork. Also, this is the reason why all the nodes in the network can have a say in the network consensus. They all can find a solution for the current block, and they all can be rewarded when they find the solution. The communication delays witnessed by the peripheral nodes will cripple their ability to find solutions and these nodes will not be incentivized to remain in the network. Hence, the segregation of the network effect mentioned earlier.

Unfortunately, given the current technological level of our civilization, we do not have at our disposal a technology that allows us to communicate fast and reliable over the large expanse of space. It would take a hell of a wait time to proces a payment made by a mining corporation in the TRAPPIST-1 system, 12 parsecs within the constellation of Aquarius, to a planetary engineering corporation located in the Sol system... twice 39 years plus the block confirmation time.

Fortunately, the Sci-Fi literature already offers a solution for our problem. For those of you, Sci-Fi nerds like myself, that have already read Rocannon's World [LEGU] and Ender's Game [CARD], the Ansible device must sound very familiar. The ansible is a fictional device capable of faster-than-light communication. To word this differently, an operator of such device can send and receive messages to and from another device over any distance with no delay.

Hence, even if only in the realm of science fiction, we will be able to devise a solution for the problem that the future cryptocurrency enthusiasts, living in the outer space colonies, will eventually face.

The Special Relativity Theorem

Before elaborating more on a required upgrade of the network protocol, we have to discuss the special relativity theorem and its implications on how time and distance are perceived in reference systems.

Albert Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1921. He received it for his contributions to the understanding of the photoelectric effect, after publishing a paper on it in 1905. At that point his contributions to the understanding of gravity through his theory of relativity were well known, but the new perspective on gravity offered by Einstein's theory was so controversial that the Nobel Prize Committee members chose to protect their reputation. They decided that it was appropriate to award Einstein the Nobel Prize for "his services to theoretical Physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect."

During his research Einstein attempted to reconcile the principle of relativity with the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light. This attempt led Einstein to the discovery of the special relativity theorem. Einstein's Gedankenexperiment (thought experiment) with a test subject travelling by train is very well known in the scientific community. If our human subject is walking towards the front of the train with velocity w with respect to the train, and the train is moving with velocity v with respect to the embankment, then an observer on the embankment will measure as W = v + w the velocity of our subject on the train. If instead of our traveller, we consider a beam of light propagating with velocity c, the velocity measured by the observer on the embarkment would be v + c. However, this violates the principle that the velocity of light is constant in any inertial reference system and equal with c. Einstein found a solution for this problem and thus resolved the incompatibility.

One direct consequence of the special relativity theorem is the Lorentz transformation.

Before the relativity theorem, time in physics had an absolute significance, independent of the state of motion of the reference system. However, every inertial reference system has its own particular time. We always have to be told which inertial reference system the statement of time refers to. If you look at your watch, the time you read is the time as measured in the Earth inertial reference system. By the way, the Earth circles the Sun on an almost circular orbit, which means that any body maintaining a constant position in the Earth reference system should experience some centripetal force. However, this centripetal component is negligible compared to the gravitational pull of the Earth. Hence, engineers use this aproximation when calculating satellite orbits.

Back to our original trail of thoughts... the axiom that lays the foundation for the Lorentz transformation states that every ray of light possesses the velocity of transmission c relative to any inertial reference system. That is the velocity of transmission in vacuo (in a vacuum).

If following Einstein's thought experiments [EINS], the above-mentioned axiom leads to a set of four equations that explain the relation between dimensional and temporal coordinates in two inertial reference systems:

  x' = (x - vt)/sqr(1 - v²/c²)
  y' = y
  z' = z
  t' = (t - x*v/c²)/sqr(1 - v²/c²)

where:

 x, y, z, t coordinates in inertial reference system K,
 x', y', z' , t' coordinates in inertial reference system K',
 v the relative velocity between inertial reference systems;

also, the expression 1//sqr(1 - v²/c²) is known as the Lorentz factor.

The Lorentz transformation equations are a more general case of the Galilean transformation:

  x' = x - vt
  y' = y
  z' = z
  t' = t

which is the basis of the assumptions of the classical mechanics as to the absolute character of both dimensional and temporal coordinates. The above are the result of replacing velocity c with ∞ in the Lorentz transformation equations.

The Lorentz transformation has a few corollaries which have an impact on time dilation, length contraction, relativistic mass, relativistic momentum, and relativistic kinetic energy. The one that concerns us is the time dilation corollary:

 Δt = γΔt'
 
where γ is defined by

 α = 1/γ = sqr(1 - v²/c²)

Assuming a clock at rest in inertial reference system K, and moving with the velocity v in the inertial reference system K', the time Δt' between two ticks as measured in the frame K' is longer than the time Δt between the same ticks as measured in the rest frame of the clock, K.

Relativistic Effects on Proof-of-Work

To better understand the relativistic effects on how relative time is perceived in two inertial reference systems (or Galilean reference systems [EINS]) we have to mention the twin paradox. The twin paradox is a thought experiment that involves two identical twins. One of the twins makes a journey into space onboard a relativistic spaceship, and upon his return to Earth discovers that his twin has aged much more than he did. Depending on how fast the spaceship moves through space and/or how long the journey was, our traveller could return to Earth and realize that several generations have passed meanwhile.

As a direct application of the twin paradox, we have Mazer Rackham, International Fleet Admiral and Ender Wiggin's mentor, as portrayed by Orson Scott Card [CARD]. The fighter pilot who destroyed the Formic Fleet Flagship, killed the Hive Queen, and ended the Second Formic Invasion, Mazer Rackham is sent on a journey on a relativistic spaceship and returns to Earth 100 years later in order to assist the International Fleet. Upon his return he has barely aged a few years.

Similarly, if a subnetwork is moving relative to the rest of the network, the nodes in the subnetwork would experience time dilation as predicted by the special relativity theorem. Hence, they are at a disadvantage compared to the rest of the nodes because they have less time available to find a solution for the proof-of-work problem. In order to make thing square for all the nodes in the network, the difficulty of the problem should be adjusted in each subnetwork using the Lorentz factor: in order to compensate for time dilation, the relativistic nodes should have to solve a simpler problem. Also, their block confirmation time should decrease as well.

One element is missing still... how do ansibles synchronize? What value has the Lorentz factor for each one of them? One simple solution for this problem is having one of the ansibles (let us say the Earth-bound one) broadcasting a beacon every fixed number of seconds. The ansibles interfacing to subnetworks would pick up the broadcast, and by measuring the time interval between the beacons, infer the Lorentz factor. Once the Lorentz factor is determined, the nodes mining on the subnetworks will have their proof-of-work difficulty and the block confirmation time adjusted accordingly.

A more Down-to-Earth Solution for the Problem

We will fork the storyline (pun intended) at Enter the Ansible paragraph, and suggest a more down-to-earth solution for the problem. The peripheral nodes are not to participate in the consensus. Their function would be just to relay messages (a.k.a. payment information) across the network. In our multi-planetary scenario, the nodes working on the proof-of-work would reside on/around the Earth, and the network nodes on Mars or any other region in the Sol system would have to wait 2x (network packets travel time) + (block confirmation time) in order to confirm a payment. However, such a solution would have an Achilles heel very hard to defend... if starting its mining engine, any peripheral node could take over the local network and force a topological fork of the network. For a node, the incentive of staying honest on the current network must be stronger than any reward obtained by cheating.

Concluding remarks

While the blogpost contains some elements of fiction, it accurately describes the cryptocurrency ecosystem, the special relativity theorem, the Lorentz transformation and its corollaries. We would like to thank the readers that went through this exercise with us. Undeniably, cryptocurrencies are disrupting the global economy and they are here to stay. Undeniably, we -- as a species -- will explore and migrate farther than the LEO. History has taught us that decentralization is the key to survival and prosperity. Let us together make the future happen.

References

[ANTO] Antonopoulos, Andreas M., Mastering Bitcoin, Second Edition, O'Reilly Media, Inc., June 2017;
[CARD] Card, Orson Scott, Ender's Game, A Tor Teen Book, 2014;
[EINS] Einstein, Albert, Relativity, The Special and the General Theory, Princeton University Press, 2015;
[LEGU] Le Guin, Ursula K., Rocannon's World, Harper & Row, 1977;
[NAKA] Nakamoto, Satoshi, Bitcoin - A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, www.bitcoin.org, 2008;