OrbitalHub

Half a gram of asteroid dust, split among three transition metals, has rewritten where Bennu came from. A team led by Maria Schönbächler at ETH Zurich reports on 23 September 2026 in Science Advances that Bennu, the near-Earth asteroid visited by NASA's OSIRIS-REx spacecraft between 2018 and 2021, did not assemble in the cold outer reaches of the young solar system the way most researchers assumed. It assembled instead near the water-ice line, in the narrow band where temperatures were cold enough to freeze water vapour into solid ice and warm enough inside to keep it as a gas. The work leans on isotopes of iron, titanium and chromium measured in five Bennu sample portions at ETH's isotope geochemistry lab, and it points to a culprit for the unusual chemistry: Jupiter, which grew large enough, fast enough, to filter coarse material out of the dust disk before Bennu's parent body could form.

Source: NASA/Goddard/University of Arizona Bennu mosaic on Wikimedia Commons (public domain).

Bennu's chemistry has been a quiet puzzle for most of the past decade. Earlier sample studies, including the joint OSIRIS-REx and Hayabusa2 preliminary results, had placed it in a family of carbon-rich objects whose closest meteoritic relatives on Earth are the rare CI chondrites: carbon-rich, water-bearing, and chemically the closest match in the meteorite collection to the Sun's own composition, with very little thermal alteration since the solar system's birth. What no one had pinned down was where in the protoplanetary disk that fingerprint had been laid down.

The old model put Bennu-class objects far out in the disk, beyond where most comets form, where accretion was slow and hydrated minerals could survive undisturbed. The new isotope measurements turn that on its head. Iron and titanium are distributed so well throughout the Bennu material that the parent object cannot have been a single coarse clump; it must have been built from fine dust mixed across the disk, with ice acting as a glue that bound fine particles into larger aggregates on the cold side of the water-ice line.

The phrase Schönbächler uses for the result is direct: Bennu is a hybrid. It does not clearly match either the inner or the outer solar system. It bears characteristics of both regions, because it was assembled in the specific transition zone where material from both sides met, according to the ETH Zurich announcement.

To anchor that conclusion, the team compared Bennu against the other carbon-rich sample-return target in the modern catalogue: Ryugu, the asteroid Hayabusa2 visited in 2019. The two objects share an isotopic fingerprint with each other and with the CI chondrites, all distinct from the rest of the meteorite collection and from other sampled asteroids. The authors frame the open question as a population question: if Bennu and Ryugu both formed in the same zone, what is that zone producing that sends objects to near-Earth orbits, and are these two a coincidence or a sample of a broader pattern?

That question hands the baton to the next sample-return missions. China's Tianwen-2 arrived at the quasi-satellite Kamoʻoalewa this summer and is expected to return a sample in 2027. Japan's MMX mission, scheduled to launch from Tanegashima in October 2026 on an H3, is set to bring back material from Phobos in 2031; Phobos is itself a possible captured asteroid, and a Phobos sample with a Bennu-like signature would extend the snow-line zone picture to the Mars system. The next-mission parallel was also flagged in Space.com's coverage.

The water-ice line is not a feature of the finished solar system; it is a feature of the protoplanetary disk, the rotating torus of gas and dust around the young Sun. Inside the line, water vapour stays in gas form. Outside it, water freezes onto dust grain surfaces as ice. In standard models the boundary sits somewhere near the present-day orbit of Jupiter, roughly five astronomical units out, and that distance matters because the disk's solid inventory changes composition sharply there: inside the line, rocky dust; outside, ice-coated dust; and right at the boundary, a transition layer where ice can sublimate, migrate inward as vapour, and recondense.

The new analysis proposes that this transition layer was the assembly site for Bennu, Ryugu, and the CI chondrites, with Jupiter acting as an active filter rather than background. The gas giant formed within roughly one million years of the Sun's birth, and its gravitational influence quickly became a barrier in the disk. Coarse, clumpy material could not easily cross Jupiter's orbital neighbourhood; fine dust could, routing around Jupiter from multiple radial directions and arriving well mixed. The result is an unusually homogeneous feedstock for planetesimals forming in the transition zone near the snow line, and that homogeneity is what the Bennu isotope data see.

The team's mechanism also explains two aspects of the sample. The first is water. Bennu's parent body incorporated enough ice that, when it was later broken up and the fragments were warmed by the Sun, hydrated minerals appeared in the regolith in the proportions the OSIRIS-REx analysis measured. Ice from just outside the snow line can sublimate as the disk evolves, drift inward as vapour, and recondense inside the line, so a transition-zone planetesimal ends up with both rocky and icy inputs. The second is the chemical match to the Sun. Fine dust, mixed by the disk's turbulence and routed around Jupiter, ends up with a bulk composition close to the pre-solar nebula because it has not been sorted into coarse and fine reservoirs. Bennu samples that average composition better than any other available asteroid material.

For the broader picture, the implication is that the asteroid belt is not the only reservoir of primitive material in the inner solar system. Near-Earth asteroids like Bennu and Ryugu may be sampling a specific radial slice of the early disk that the main belt, with its heavy thermal and collisional processing, has blurred out. If planetary migration can scatter snow-line objects into near-Earth orbits, then the Bennu sample is not a quirk of one asteroid but a window onto a specific formation environment that the meteorite collection only hints at.

What is striking about the result is how much depends on a small measurement. The five Bennu sample portions, totalling a fraction of a gram, were analysed for isotopic ratios of three elements at a single laboratory over months. None of that is large-scale geophysics or a flagship space telescope survey. It is the kind of bench-scale work that historically has rewritten meteorite science, and it has now done so for an asteroid whose sample exists on Earth only because a NASA spacecraft flew for two and a half years to a rock the size of a small mountain, picked up its surface with a robotic arm, and parachuted the result home.

The Bennu story is not finished. Sample analysis at laboratories around the world is ongoing, with new allocations going out in waves as the OSIRIS-REx curatorial team works through the 120 grams that came back. Schönbächler and her collaborators flag the open question directly: are other asteroids in the same isotopic family, and how widespread is the snow-line zone fingerprint across the inner solar system? That question will not be answered by Bennu alone. It will be answered by what comes back from Kamoʻoalewa, then Phobos, then whatever the next generation of sample-return missions chooses to visit.

For now, the picture is this: Bennu is chemically the closest match in our sample collection to the mixture of elements the Sun itself inherited. Its formation was not a quiet outer-disk story; it was a product of a specific radial neighbourhood in the young solar system, with Jupiter acting as the gatekeeper that kept coarse material out and let fine dust through. The fact that we have a piece of it in a laboratory in Zurich, three years after it fell out of the Utah sky, is a measure of how much of the early solar system can be reconstructed from a sample small enough to lose between your fingers.

Abstract

The blogpost explores relativistic effects on proof-of-work based cryptocurrency protocols. Cryptocurrencies are here to stay and it is quite plausible that future human colonists spread across the solar system and beyond will use a decentralized cryptocurrency as opposed to a fiat currency issued by a central authority. The low transaction fees, the ubiquitous access, not being bound by exchange rates or interest rates, not being controlled by financial institutions who are serving foreign interests -- these are some of the advantages cryptocurrencies will enjoy in the thriving exo-economy.

Motivation

At present, on a cryptocurrency network, the information exchanged by the nodes in the network reaches each node almost instantaneously. The speed at which the TCP/IP packets travel on the network and the fact that the Internet spans only the Earth and the LEO makes this possible. However, once the region the network is spread across will reach certain boundaries, the network size would have negative impact on the network: increasing communication failures due to network delays, more frequent and longer blockchain forks as part of the proof-of-work protocol, network segregation into local sub-networks (let us call them topological forks), just to name a few.

Nullius in verba... as they say. Let's go deeper into details and figure out a feasible solution for a truly interplanetary cryptocurrency.

Cryptocurrency 101

You can think of a cryptocurrency as a digital money ecosystem. Plain and simple. A collection of technologies are part of this ecosystem, all of them the result of years of research in the cryptography and distributed systems fields: a decentralized network of computers, a public transaction ledger -- also known as a blockchain, a protocol that consists of a set of rules for transaction validation, a decentralized consensus mechanism. [ANTO]

A decentralized network of computers ensures the resilience of the network. We can think of both computing power and data storage capabilities. As the computing power is distributed across the network, any disruption can be successfully handled by the network. Transaction data resides on all nodes of the network. This implies that even physical damage done to network nodes will not take out the network.

The blockchain is a public distributed ledger which stores all transactions handled by the network. As the name suggests, the blockchain is a list of data blocks. Each of these blocks contains a set of transactions, as many as can fit in the block, given the maximum size of the block (a characteristic of the network). Transactions contain sender and receiver info, and the amount/asset that is changing ownership, and they are broadcasted and added to blocks by network nodes. Blocks are linked to the previous block in the chain by a cryptographic hash (the hash of the previous block becomes part of the current block). This backward link leads all the way to the first block in the chain, the Genesis block. Each cryptocurrency blockchain has one. The cryptographic hashes have an important role in protecting the blockchain from tampering attempts.

The transaction validation rules enforced by the nodes in the network ensure that the content of each block in the blockchain is valid. By far, the most frequent form of fraud is double spending. The validation process makes sure that the inputs on the transactions exist and that they have not been already spent. The transactions marked as invalid are rejected by the network and do not make it on the blockchain.

The consensus mechanism is designed so that all the nodes in the network can agree on the set of transactions to be included in the current block. It shifts the authority and the credibility required by a central clearing house to a network of nodes. Important to mention here that, inherently, the nodes do not trust each other, and they do not have to because the trust is enforced by the consensus mechanism itself.

The Proof-of-Work

We mentioned above that one of the key innovations that make cryptocurrencies possible is the decentralized consensus mechanism. Currently, the de facto consensus mechanism is the proof-of-work.

The proof-of-work consensus mechanism was proposed by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2008 [NAKA]. In general, a proof-of-work is a piece of data that requires costly and time consuming computational effort, but it is very easy to verify. A very good analogy is one of your semester projects in college... it takes you a whole semester to finalize it, but it takes very little time and effort for your supervisor to evaluate and grade it. Similarly, proof-of-work is used by cryptocurrencies for block generation. For the network to accept the block, nodes must complete a proof-of-work which also guarantees the integrity of the transactions included in the block. The difficulty of the proof-of-work is adjusted by the network so that a new block can be generated every fixed time interval. This fixed time interval is characteristic to every cryptocurrency. Most notably, for Bitcoin this time interval is set to 10 minutes.

Satoshi Nakamoto's solution, emobodied by the proof-of-work algorithm above, achieves consensus on the network without a central trusted authority (hence the name decentralized consensus mechanism).

Enter the Ansible

For the astute reader, it is quite obvious at this point that communication delays between the network nodes have a direct effect on the protocol described above. An important assumption made when the protocol was designed is that these delays are small, and this is why they can be handled by the network when the nodes choose to follow and validate the blocks on the longest blockchain fork. Also, this is the reason why all the nodes in the network can have a say in the network consensus. They all can find a solution for the current block, and they all can be rewarded when they find the solution. The communication delays witnessed by the peripheral nodes will cripple their ability to find solutions and these nodes will not be incentivized to remain in the network. Hence, the segregation of the network effect mentioned earlier.

Unfortunately, given the current technological level of our civilization, we do not have at our disposal a technology that allows us to communicate fast and reliable over the large expanse of space. It would take a hell of a wait time to proces a payment made by a mining corporation in the TRAPPIST-1 system, 12 parsecs within the constellation of Aquarius, to a planetary engineering corporation located in the Sol system... twice 39 years plus the block confirmation time.

Fortunately, the Sci-Fi literature already offers a solution for our problem. For those of you, Sci-Fi nerds like myself, that have already read Rocannon's World [LEGU] and Ender's Game [CARD], the Ansible device must sound very familiar. The ansible is a fictional device capable of faster-than-light communication. To word this differently, an operator of such device can send and receive messages to and from another device over any distance with no delay.

Hence, even if only in the realm of science fiction, we will be able to devise a solution for the problem that the future cryptocurrency enthusiasts, living in the outer space colonies, will eventually face.

The Special Relativity Theorem

Before elaborating more on a required upgrade of the network protocol, we have to discuss the special relativity theorem and its implications on how time and distance are perceived in reference systems.

Albert Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1921. He received it for his contributions to the understanding of the photoelectric effect, after publishing a paper on it in 1905. At that point his contributions to the understanding of gravity through his theory of relativity were well known, but the new perspective on gravity offered by Einstein's theory was so controversial that the Nobel Prize Committee members chose to protect their reputation. They decided that it was appropriate to award Einstein the Nobel Prize for "his services to theoretical Physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect."

During his research Einstein attempted to reconcile the principle of relativity with the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light. This attempt led Einstein to the discovery of the special relativity theorem. Einstein's Gedankenexperiment (thought experiment) with a test subject travelling by train is very well known in the scientific community. If our human subject is walking towards the front of the train with velocity w with respect to the train, and the train is moving with velocity v with respect to the embankment, then an observer on the embankment will measure as W = v + w the velocity of our subject on the train. If instead of our traveller, we consider a beam of light propagating with velocity c, the velocity measured by the observer on the embarkment would be v + c. However, this violates the principle that the velocity of light is constant in any inertial reference system and equal with c. Einstein found a solution for this problem and thus resolved the incompatibility.

One direct consequence of the special relativity theorem is the Lorentz transformation.

Before the relativity theorem, time in physics had an absolute significance, independent of the state of motion of the reference system. However, every inertial reference system has its own particular time. We always have to be told which inertial reference system the statement of time refers to. If you look at your watch, the time you read is the time as measured in the Earth inertial reference system. By the way, the Earth circles the Sun on an almost circular orbit, which means that any body maintaining a constant position in the Earth reference system should experience some centripetal force. However, this centripetal component is negligible compared to the gravitational pull of the Earth. Hence, engineers use this aproximation when calculating satellite orbits.

Back to our original trail of thoughts... the axiom that lays the foundation for the Lorentz transformation states that every ray of light possesses the velocity of transmission c relative to any inertial reference system. That is the velocity of transmission in vacuo (in a vacuum).

If following Einstein's thought experiments [EINS], the above-mentioned axiom leads to a set of four equations that explain the relation between dimensional and temporal coordinates in two inertial reference systems:

  x' = (x - vt)/sqr(1 - v²/c²)
  y' = y
  z' = z
  t' = (t - x*v/c²)/sqr(1 - v²/c²)

where:

 x, y, z, t coordinates in inertial reference system K,
 x', y', z' , t' coordinates in inertial reference system K',
 v the relative velocity between inertial reference systems;

also, the expression 1//sqr(1 - v²/c²) is known as the Lorentz factor.

The Lorentz transformation equations are a more general case of the Galilean transformation:

  x' = x - vt
  y' = y
  z' = z
  t' = t

which is the basis of the assumptions of the classical mechanics as to the absolute character of both dimensional and temporal coordinates. The above are the result of replacing velocity c with ∞ in the Lorentz transformation equations.

The Lorentz transformation has a few corollaries which have an impact on time dilation, length contraction, relativistic mass, relativistic momentum, and relativistic kinetic energy. The one that concerns us is the time dilation corollary:

 Δt = γΔt'
 
where γ is defined by

 α = 1/γ = sqr(1 - v²/c²)

Assuming a clock at rest in inertial reference system K, and moving with the velocity v in the inertial reference system K', the time Δt' between two ticks as measured in the frame K' is longer than the time Δt between the same ticks as measured in the rest frame of the clock, K.

Relativistic Effects on Proof-of-Work

To better understand the relativistic effects on how relative time is perceived in two inertial reference systems (or Galilean reference systems [EINS]) we have to mention the twin paradox. The twin paradox is a thought experiment that involves two identical twins. One of the twins makes a journey into space onboard a relativistic spaceship, and upon his return to Earth discovers that his twin has aged much more than he did. Depending on how fast the spaceship moves through space and/or how long the journey was, our traveller could return to Earth and realize that several generations have passed meanwhile.

As a direct application of the twin paradox, we have Mazer Rackham, International Fleet Admiral and Ender Wiggin's mentor, as portrayed by Orson Scott Card [CARD]. The fighter pilot who destroyed the Formic Fleet Flagship, killed the Hive Queen, and ended the Second Formic Invasion, Mazer Rackham is sent on a journey on a relativistic spaceship and returns to Earth 100 years later in order to assist the International Fleet. Upon his return he has barely aged a few years.

Similarly, if a subnetwork is moving relative to the rest of the network, the nodes in the subnetwork would experience time dilation as predicted by the special relativity theorem. Hence, they are at a disadvantage compared to the rest of the nodes because they have less time available to find a solution for the proof-of-work problem. In order to make thing square for all the nodes in the network, the difficulty of the problem should be adjusted in each subnetwork using the Lorentz factor: in order to compensate for time dilation, the relativistic nodes should have to solve a simpler problem. Also, their block confirmation time should decrease as well.

One element is missing still... how do ansibles synchronize? What value has the Lorentz factor for each one of them? One simple solution for this problem is having one of the ansibles (let us say the Earth-bound one) broadcasting a beacon every fixed number of seconds. The ansibles interfacing to subnetworks would pick up the broadcast, and by measuring the time interval between the beacons, infer the Lorentz factor. Once the Lorentz factor is determined, the nodes mining on the subnetworks will have their proof-of-work difficulty and the block confirmation time adjusted accordingly.

A more Down-to-Earth Solution for the Problem

We will fork the storyline (pun intended) at Enter the Ansible paragraph, and suggest a more down-to-earth solution for the problem. The peripheral nodes are not to participate in the consensus. Their function would be just to relay messages (a.k.a. payment information) across the network. In our multi-planetary scenario, the nodes working on the proof-of-work would reside on/around the Earth, and the network nodes on Mars or any other region in the Sol system would have to wait 2x (network packets travel time) + (block confirmation time) in order to confirm a payment. However, such a solution would have an Achilles heel very hard to defend... if starting its mining engine, any peripheral node could take over the local network and force a topological fork of the network. For a node, the incentive of staying honest on the current network must be stronger than any reward obtained by cheating.

Concluding remarks

While the blogpost contains some elements of fiction, it accurately describes the cryptocurrency ecosystem, the special relativity theorem, the Lorentz transformation and its corollaries. We would like to thank the readers that went through this exercise with us. Undeniably, cryptocurrencies are disrupting the global economy and they are here to stay. Undeniably, we -- as a species -- will explore and migrate farther than the LEO. History has taught us that decentralization is the key to survival and prosperity. Let us together make the future happen.

References

[ANTO] Antonopoulos, Andreas M., Mastering Bitcoin, Second Edition, O'Reilly Media, Inc., June 2017;
[CARD] Card, Orson Scott, Ender's Game, A Tor Teen Book, 2014;
[EINS] Einstein, Albert, Relativity, The Special and the General Theory, Princeton University Press, 2015;
[LEGU] Le Guin, Ursula K., Rocannon's World, Harper & Row, 1977;
[NAKA] Nakamoto, Satoshi, Bitcoin - A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, www.bitcoin.org, 2008;