OrbitalHub

The place where space exploration, science, and engineering meet

Domain is for sale. $50,000,000.00 USD. Direct any inquiries to contact@orbitalhub.com.

Archive for October, 2008

October 6, 2008

Power Generation Onboard Spacecrafts (IV)

Posted by

 

In the previous three posts we presented the most common solutions employed by spacecraft designers in order to generate the power needed by onboard systems during a space mission: the batteries, the solar panels, and the radioisotope thermoelectric generators. We will conclude by presenting two more existing solutions: the fuel cells and the nuclear reactors.

 

Credits: NASA

 

Fuel cells are devices that convert chemical energy into electricity. Even if using the same type of energy conversion, fuel cells are more efficient than the batteries. Electricity is produced directly from an oxidation reaction. The fuel and an oxidant react in the presence of a catalytic material inside the cell. By eliminating the reaction products and maintaining the input flows, fuel cells can operate continuously. For space applications, only hydrogen and oxygen have been used as reactants. Other sources rich in hydrogen that can be used as fuel are methane, methanol, and ethanol.

Regenerative fuel cells are a viable option for energy storage in large space systems. They could successfully replace the secondary batteries. The regenerative fuel cells would use stored hydrogen and oxygen to generate electricity during eclipse periods and would use solar arrays to generate electricity to recharge the fuel cells during the illuminated portion of the orbit. The generated electricity would be used to produce oxygen and hydrogen by electrolyzing the water produced by the fuel cells during normal operation. As far as we know, there are no direct applications of regenerative fuel cells in the space industry to date.

 

The nuclear reactors used by spacecrafts for power generation are smaller versions of the nuclear reactors used onboard nuclear submarines or nuclear aircraft carriers. They are the only compact solution for large power levels, hundreds of kilowatts to megawatts. In principle, the controlled nuclear reaction generates the heat, while an agent carries the heat away and is used to generate steam. The steam is used to drive a turbine that generates electricity. I was not able to find any technical details on the cooling agent and the liquid (or gas) used to drive the turbine (or even if a turbine is used) for the SP-100. SP-100 is the only nuclear reactor destined to power space systems built by the US. I was able to dig up the information that the Russian-built nuclear reactors that operated on the RORSAT reconnaissance satellites used NaK-78 as cooling agent (NaK-78 is a sodium and potassium fusible alloy with a low melting point).

 

SP-100 initially was supposed to have a mass of approximately 3,000 kg and generate 100 kWe. The SP-100 program was eventually canceled due to the fact that as the design matured the weight exceeded the acceptable limit.

 

Credits: NASA/JPL

 

The RORSAT Russian satellites have an interesting story… they had active radars onboard and had to be placed in low Earth orbits in order to have the surveillance equipment work effectively. Orbiting in LEOs, RORSAT missions had a shorter lifespan and had to perform a destructive re-entry in the atmosphere. In order to avoid the re-entry of any radioactive material, the nuclear reactor’s core was ejected in a so-called disposal orbit (a high orbit that would postpone the re-entry of the core for a couple of hundreds of years).

Failures were recorded. Most notably, in 1978, a RORSAT mission failed to boost the radioactive core into the disposal orbit and radioactive material entered the atmosphere above the Northwest Territories in Canada. The affected area had over 124,000 square kilometers.

 

A major disadvantage of the deployment of nuclear reactors is that for manned missions, heavy shielding is required. The shield mass can be reduced by employing designs that use geometric separation, but this is attainable only for large configurations. Other disadvantages are the reduction in reliability due to the moving parts and the possible mechanical interferences due to the vibrations that any dynamic system generates. Despite all these drawbacks, nuclear reactors offer a considerable promise for the future.

 

Power systems are essential for a space mission and, due to the challenges raised by the space environment, finding the right solution for a space mission requires careful consideration of many factors. Each solution comes with its own advantages and disadvantages making the work of space systems design engineers hard and rewarding in the same time.

 

We hope you enjoyed reading this series of posts and that you found them interesting. We are looking forward to your feedback and welcome your comments.

 

  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit
  • Live
  • TwitThis
October 3, 2008

Carnival of Space #73

Posted by

 

The Carnival of Space #73 is hosted this week by Alice Enevoldsen at Alice’s Astro Info. This week’s Carnival theme is the celebration of NASA’s 50th Anniversary.

 

  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit
  • Live
  • TwitThis
October 2, 2008

Jules Verne Ends the Space Journey

Posted by

 

We covered the ATV Jules Verne mission in a previous post (Jules Verne close to the End of its Space Journey) and mentioned that the typical ATV mission ends with a destructive re-entry above the Pacific Ocean. We come back with this post to present the conclusion of the ATV mission.

 

Credits: NASA

 

The ATV separated from the International Space Station (ISS) on September 5, 2008, filled with more than 2 tonnes of waste. The ATV undocked from the aft port of the Zvezda Service Module and it was placed in a parking orbit for three weeks. While being parked, a series of tests of the guidance and control systems were performed.

By carrying out re-phasing maneuvers, the ATV positioned itself to a predefined position behind and underneath the ISS. In this way, the crews from the ISS and from two specially equipped observation planes in the skies of the South Pacific were able to view and to record the re-entry.

 

Credits: NASA

 

The re-entry was initially modeled on computer in order to anticipate the trajectory and the location of the area where the breakout fragments of the spacecraft will fall. The observations helped determine if the re-entry matched the computer modeling.

 

As planned, the first ATV mission concluded on September 29, 2008, when two engine burns de-orbited the spacecraft. ESA scheduled the re-entry on this date because the lighting conditions were appropriate for an imagery experiment and the breakup happened at approximately 75 km above the waters of the Pacific Ocean. The remaining fragments fell into the Pacific some 12 minutes later.

 

Credits: ESA

 

This first mission proved the logistical value of the ATV. The delivery of 6 tonnes of cargo to the ISS, the automatic rendezvous and docking capabilities, the attitude control maneuvers performed, they all show how far the European space capabilities have developed.

 

ESA engineers are already working on the next two ATV spacecrafts. The next ATV mission is scheduled for 2010 and there are many proposals to adapt the ATV to other types of missions.

 

Credits: ESA

 

One important variation of the typical ATV mission is the Large Cargo Return (LCR). The LCR configuration will consist of a large cargo capsule capable of bringing back on Earth hundreds of kilograms of cargo and valuable experiment results. LCR would be able to dock to the US side of the ISS that has larger docking ports and would make possible the transfer of complete payload racks.

 

The video showing the destructive re-entry of Jules Verne is available on the ESA website.

 

  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit
  • Live
  • TwitThis
October 1, 2008

ESA to Study the Birth of the Universe

Posted by

 

Some of the most important questions asked in modern science are: how did the Universe begin, how did it evolve to its present state, and how will it continue to evolve in the future? To ask these questions, the remnant radiation that filled the Universe immediately after the Big Bang must be analyzed. This remnant radiation is known as the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB).

 

Credits: ESA

 

ESA plans to answer these questions with Planck: the first European mission to study the birth of the Universe. The Planck Mission will collect CMB radiation measurements using highly sensitive sensors that are operating at very low temperatures. The measurements will be used to map the smallest variations of the CMB detected to date.

 

The Planck spacecraft will weigh around 1,900 kg at launch. It is 4.2 m high and has a maximum diameter of 4.2 m. There are two modules that comprise the spacecraft: a service module and the payload module.

 

The service module contains the systems for power generation, attitude control, data handling and communication, and the warm components of the scientific payload. The payload module contains the telescope, the optical bench, the detectors, and the cooling system (which is of critical importance, as we shall see).

 

The telescope is an important onboard component. The Planck telescope is a Gregorian telescope with an off-axis parabolic primary mirror 1.75 x 1.5 meters in size. A secondary mirror focuses the incoming microwave radiation on two sets of highly sensitive detectors: the Low Frequency Instrument (LFI) and the High Frequency Instrument (HFI). The Gregorian design offers two key advantages: it is compact and it does not block the optical path.

 

Credits: ESA/Thales

 

The LFI will be operating at –253 degrees Celsius. The array of twenty-two tuned radio receivers that comprise LFI will produce high-sensitivity, multi-frequency measurements of the microwave sky in the frequency range of 27 GHz to 77 GHz.

 

The HFI has to be cooled to –272.9 degrees Celsius in order to operate (one tenth of one degree above the absolute zero!). HFI’s fifty-two bolometric detectors will produce high-sensitivity, multi-frequency measurements of the diffuse sky radiation in the frequency range of 84 GHz to 1 THz.

 

A baffle surrounds the telescope and instruments. The baffle prevents light from the Sun and the Moon from altering the measurements. A complex system of refrigerators is used onboard the spacecraft in order to achieve the temperatures needed for nominal operation. The detectors have to work at temperatures close to the absolute zero, otherwise their own emissions can alter the measurements.

 

The two instruments will be used to measure the small variations of the CMB across the sky. By combining the measurements, a full sky map of unprecedented precision will be produced. The map will help astronomers decide which theories on the birth and the evolution of the Universe are correct. Questions like ‘what is the age of the Universe?’ or ‘what is the nature of the dark-matter?’ will be answered.

 

The mission was initially designed as COBRAS/SAMBA (Cosmic Background Radiation Anisotropy Satellite and Satellite for Measurement of Background Anisotropies) because it grew out of two mission proposals that had similar objectives. When the mission was approved in 1996, it was also renamed as Planck in honor of the German scientist Max Planck (1858 – 1947). Max Planck was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1918.

 

Credits: ESA

 

The mission is a collaborative effort. The Planck spacecraft was designed and built by a consortium led by Alcatel Alenia Space (Cannes, France). The telescope mirrors are manufactured by EADS Astrium (Friedrichshafen, Germany). The Low Frequency Instrument (LFI) was designed and built by a consortium led by the Instituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica (IASF) in Bologna, Italy. The High Frequency Instrument (HFI) was designed and built by a consortium led by the Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale (CNRS) in Orsay, France.

 

The Planck Mission has two predecessors: the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) and the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP).

 

Credits: ESA

 

The Planck spacecraft will be launched in early 2009 from Kourou, French Guiana. An Ariane 5 booster will place the spacecraft in a trajectory towards the L2 point. The L2 point stands for Second Lagrangian Point and it is located around 1.5 million kilometers away from Earth in a direction diametrically opposite the Sun. It will be a dual launch configuration, as the Herschel spacecraft will be launched together with Planck.

 

Between four to six months after the launch, Planck will reach its final position. It will take six more months before Planck will be declared operational.

 

Planck will perform scientific measurements for fifteen months, allowing two complete sky surveys. The spacecraft will be operational as along as there are resources for the cooling systems onboard.

 

For more details on the ESA’s Planck Mission you can visit the mission’s home page on the ESA website.

 

  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit
  • Live
  • TwitThis