OrbitalHub

Credits: ESA

ESA is about to launch a satellite capable of measuring very small variations in the Earth’s gravitational field. Even if it is a common-sense assumption that the force of gravity on the surface of the Earth has a constant value, there are subtle variations caused by the rotation of the Earth, the position of the mountains and ocean trenches, and by the variations of the Earth’s inner density. Determining the variations in the Earth’s gravitational field will improve our knowledge of ocean circulation, and will also help to make advances in geodesy and surveying.

The Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) satellite will measure the small variations of the gravitational field. GOCE is the most advanced gravity space mission to date. Scientists will build a detailed map of Earth’s gravity using data collected by GOCE.

Credits: ESA

In order to make accurate measurements, the GOCE satellite will orbit in a low altitude orbit, around 250 km above the surface of the Earth.

An elongated shape has been chosen for the satellite design to minimize the atmospheric drag. GOCE is five meters long, one meter in diameter, and has a mass of roughly 1050 kg.

The heart of the GOCE satellite is a scientific instrument called gradiometer. The gradiometer consists of three pairs of accelerometers, and it measures acceleration variations over short distances between proof masses inside the satellite. One important thing to mention here is that the calibration of the gradiometer takes place after launch. The reason? The instrument cannot be calibrated on the ground, under the force of gravity.

Credits: ESA

You can find out more about the calibration of the GOCE instrument by reading an interesting article on ESA’s website.

Daniel Lamarre, a Canadian national working at ESA’s European Space Research and Technology Centre (ESTEC), is the inventor and the developer of the method used for the calibration of the instrument. He won an ESA award for developing the calibration method.

The GOCE satellite will be launched from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in northern Russia. Eurockot Launch Services GmbH, a company that provides commercial launch services with the Rockot launch system, will be the launch provider for the GOCE mission. Eurockot was formed in 1993. EADS Astrium, located in Bremen, Germany, holds 51 percent of the company. The Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Center in Moscow, Russia, owns the remaining 49 percent.

Credits: ESA

The Rockot launcher is based on the SS-19 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles. The upper stage of the launch system, Breeze KM, extends the performance capabilities of the Rockot lower stages. The system is capable of injecting a 1950 kg payload into Low Earth Orbit (LEO). The re-ignitable main engine of the Breeze KM allows various injection schemes for the payload. The length of the launch vehicle is 29 meters, with a launch mass of 107 tons. The external diameter of the three stages is 2.5 meters, while the payload fairing has an external diameter of 2.6 meters and a height of 6.7 meters.

The initial launch date was postponed due to an anomaly identified in the guidance and navigation subsystem of the Breeze KM upper stage. The new launch date has been scheduled for Monday, October 27th, 2008.

The Carnival of Space #74 is hosted this week at Kentucky Space. A really good collection this week!

Credits: ESA

ESA plans to design and build an autonomous lifting and aerodynamically controlled re-entry system. Critical technologies are being tested: instrumentation for aerodynamics and aerothermodynamics, thermal protection and hot-structure solutions, guidance, navigation, and flight control using a combination of jets and aerodynamic flaps. The Intermediate Experimental Vehicle (IXV) will be the European platform for in-flight testing of re-entry technologies.

The design activities are already underway; the development of the spacecraft is scheduled to begin in January 2009.

The mission is planned to launch from the European spaceport at Kourou, French Guiana. In 2012, a new launch vehicle will inject IXV into a low Earth orbit. The small spacecraft will perform a controlled re-entry, its descent slowed by a parachute, and will land in the Pacific Ocean.

Credits: ESA

ESA released a new video with computer generated animation that presents the planned IXV mission.

We presented in a previous post the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) mission. The goals of the LRO mission are to map the lunar resources and to create a detailed 3D map of the lunar surface in preparation for future NASA missions to the Moon. However, NASA is not the only space agency that has high hopes regarding the exploration of the Moon. The Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) is another agency heavily involved in space activities.

Credits: ISRO

Interest in undertaking a lunar scientific mission was sparked at a meeting of the Indian Academy of Sciences in 1999. One year later, the Astronautical Society of India made a recommendation supporting the idea.

The ISRO formed a National Lunar Mission Task Force that involved leading Indian scientists. The Task Force provided an assessment on the feasibility of such a mission. The mission, called Chandrayaan-1, was approved in November 2003 for an estimated cost of $83 million USD.

The Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft is a 1.5 meter cube with a weight mass of approximately 523 kg. The spacecraft bus is based on an already developed meteorological satellite. Chandrayaan-1 will carry a 30 kg probe that will be released to penetrate the lunar surface. The power for the onboard systems is generated by a solar panel. The 750 watts generated by the solar panel will be stored by the rechargeable batteries onboard the spacecraft. Maneuvering in the lunar orbit is done using a bipropellant propulsion system.

Credits: ISRO

The scientific payload contains a diverse collection of instruments. The instruments were designed and developed by ISRO, ESA, NASA, and the Bulgarian Space Agency.

There are two instruments that will map the surface of the Moon: the Terrain Mapping Camera (TMC) will produce a 5 meter resolution map of the surface, and the Lunar Laser Ranging Instrument (LLRI) will scan the lunar surface and determine the surface topography.

The X-ray spectrometer onboard the spacecraft has three components: the Imaging X-ray Spectrometer (CIXS), the High Energy X-ray/gamma ray spectrometer (HEX), and the Solar X-ray Monitor (SXM). The X-ray spectrometer will measure the concentration of certain elements on the lunar surface as well as monitor the solar flux in order to normalize the results of the measurements taken.

The mineralogical configuration of the surface will be mapped by four instruments: the Hyper Spectral Imager (HySI), the Sub-keV Atom Reflecting Analyzer (SARA), the Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3), and the Near-Infrared Spectrometer (SIR-2).

The Radiation Dose Monitor (RADOM-7) will record the radiation levels in the lunar orbit.

Credits: ISRO

ISRO has two operational launch vehicles: the Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV) and the Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV). For Chandrayaan-1, ISRO has chosen to use PSLV as a launch vehicle. The PSLV developmental flights were completed in 1996 and the rocket has had 12 successful missions since then. PSLV is 44.43 meters tall and has a weight of 294 tonnes at launch. It can inject a payload of 1,000 kg – 1,200 kg into a polar orbit.

The launch of the Chandrayaan-1 mission is scheduled for the end of October 2008. The PSLV rocket will take off from the Satish Dhawan Space Center in Sriharikota on the southeast coast of India. The transfer to the lunar orbit will take approximately five days and after additional maneuvers the spacecraft will reach its final polar orbit, 100 km above the surface. The spacecraft will be operational for two years.

The Chandrayaan-1 mission opens the door to future lunar missions. ISRO has already committed to a second Chandrayaan mission that will land a rover on the surface of the Moon. The rover will perform a number of experiments on the lunar surface and the results will be relayed to Earth by the Chandrayaan-2 orbiter.

We will come back with more details about the Chandrayaan-1 mission as the events unfold. Please stay tuned on the OrbitalHub frequency.

In the previous three posts we presented the most common solutions employed by spacecraft designers in order to generate the power needed by onboard systems during a space mission: the batteries, the solar panels, and the radioisotope thermoelectric generators. We will conclude by presenting two more existing solutions: the fuel cells and the nuclear reactors.

 

Credits: NASA

 

Fuel cells are devices that convert chemical energy into electricity. Even if using the same type of energy conversion, fuel cells are more efficient than the batteries. Electricity is produced directly from an oxidation reaction. The fuel and an oxidant react in the presence of a catalytic material inside the cell. By eliminating the reaction products and maintaining the input flows, fuel cells can operate continuously. For space applications, only hydrogen and oxygen have been used as reactants. Other sources rich in hydrogen that can be used as fuel are methane, methanol, and ethanol.

Regenerative fuel cells are a viable option for energy storage in large space systems. They could successfully replace the secondary batteries. The regenerative fuel cells would use stored hydrogen and oxygen to generate electricity during eclipse periods and would use solar arrays to generate electricity to recharge the fuel cells during the illuminated portion of the orbit. The generated electricity would be used to produce oxygen and hydrogen by electrolyzing the water produced by the fuel cells during normal operation. As far as we know, there are no direct applications of regenerative fuel cells in the space industry to date.

 

The nuclear reactors used by spacecrafts for power generation are smaller versions of the nuclear reactors used onboard nuclear submarines or nuclear aircraft carriers. They are the only compact solution for large power levels, hundreds of kilowatts to megawatts. In principle, the controlled nuclear reaction generates the heat, while an agent carries the heat away and is used to generate steam. The steam is used to drive a turbine that generates electricity. I was not able to find any technical details on the cooling agent and the liquid (or gas) used to drive the turbine (or even if a turbine is used) for the SP-100. SP-100 is the only nuclear reactor destined to power space systems built by the US. I was able to dig up the information that the Russian-built nuclear reactors that operated on the RORSAT reconnaissance satellites used NaK-78 as cooling agent (NaK-78 is a sodium and potassium fusible alloy with a low melting point).

 

SP-100 initially was supposed to have a mass of approximately 3,000 kg and generate 100 kWe. The SP-100 program was eventually canceled due to the fact that as the design matured the weight exceeded the acceptable limit.

 

Credits: NASA/JPL

 

The RORSAT Russian satellites have an interesting story… they had active radars onboard and had to be placed in low Earth orbits in order to have the surveillance equipment work effectively. Orbiting in LEOs, RORSAT missions had a shorter lifespan and had to perform a destructive re-entry in the atmosphere. In order to avoid the re-entry of any radioactive material, the nuclear reactor’s core was ejected in a so-called disposal orbit (a high orbit that would postpone the re-entry of the core for a couple of hundreds of years).

Failures were recorded. Most notably, in 1978, a RORSAT mission failed to boost the radioactive core into the disposal orbit and radioactive material entered the atmosphere above the Northwest Territories in Canada. The affected area had over 124,000 square kilometers.

 

A major disadvantage of the deployment of nuclear reactors is that for manned missions, heavy shielding is required. The shield mass can be reduced by employing designs that use geometric separation, but this is attainable only for large configurations. Other disadvantages are the reduction in reliability due to the moving parts and the possible mechanical interferences due to the vibrations that any dynamic system generates. Despite all these drawbacks, nuclear reactors offer a considerable promise for the future.

 

Power systems are essential for a space mission and, due to the challenges raised by the space environment, finding the right solution for a space mission requires careful consideration of many factors. Each solution comes with its own advantages and disadvantages making the work of space systems design engineers hard and rewarding in the same time.

 

We hope you enjoyed reading this series of posts and that you found them interesting. We are looking forward to your feedback and welcome your comments.

 

The Carnival of Space #73 is hosted this week by Alice Enevoldsen at Alice’s Astro Info. This week’s Carnival theme is the celebration of NASA’s 50th Anniversary.