OrbitalHub

This post is the first in a series discussing how power is generated onboard spacecrafts.

Credits: NASA

One major component of a spacecraft is the power system. All systems onboard a spacecraft need electricity in order to run. From the early days of space flight, development of this essential system has been a challenge for spacecraft designers.

There are a number of factors that spacecraft designers must take into account: the size, the accessibility, and some operational constraints that can limit the options available. A good example of operational constraints is a spacecraft operating in the Van Allen radiation belts, where radiation exposure can contribute to the rapid degradation of the solar arrays. Other important factors that designers need to consider are the lifetime required by the mission, the orbital parameters, and the attitude control concept employed.

Probably some space geeks (especially science fiction fans) would think of M/AM reactors onboard spacecrafts, but the reality is not as glamorous. Maybe future generations of spacecrafts will use that type of technology, but the present generation is using what some might call primitive technology by comparison.

Credits: NASA

As a general requirement, power systems must control, condition, and process the power received in order to comply with the needs of the systems onboard the spacecraft. The power is received from the primary source, which can be a battery, a solar array, etc. For the duration of the mission, the power system must supply stable and uninterrupted power. If not, the mission is lost.

In the second part of this series, we will take a look at the options available to spacecraft engineers when designing the power system for space missions.

Yes, they do. They really do! One of NASA’s deep space mission probes, New Horizons, is undergoing a check. The mission operators wake the spacecraft out of hibernation once a year. A number of checks are performed: the antennas must be pointed toward Earth, the trajectory must be corrected if needed, and instruments must be calibrated. These checks last more than a usual visit to a doctor… about 50 days. The operators verify the health of the spacecraft, perform maintenance on subsystems and instruments, and gather navigation data.

Credits: NASA

The highlight of the current check was the upload of a new version of the software that runs the spacecraft’s Command and Data Handling system. The brain transplant, as it was called, was a success. The mission team at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) in Laurel, Maryland, sent the updates through NASA’s Deep Space Network (DSN) to the spacecraft. Two more updates are to be sent for both the Autonomy and Guidance and Control systems.

All commands that are sent to the spacecraft must pass a rigorous development and review process. After the command sequences are tested on the ground, the mission operations team will send them from the New Horizons Mission Operations Center at APL using the DSN, which is operated and managed by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

Credits: NASA

The New Horizons spacecraft was launched on January 19th, 2006 on top of an Atlas V rocket from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida.

The trajectory chosen for the probe is not complicated, as the probe is flying to Pluto using just one gravity boost from Jupiter. The journey consists of 5 segments: the early cruise, the Jupiter encounter, the interplanetary cruise, the Pluto-Charon encounter, and the Kuiper Belt.

During the early cruise segment of the voyage, spacecraft and instrument checkouts, instrument calibrations, and trajectory corrections were performed. Rehearsals for the Jupiter encounter were also conducted.

During the second segment of the voyage, the closest approach to Jupiter occurred on February 28th, 2007.

Credits: JHUAPL / SwRI

The third segment of the voyage consists mainly of spacecraft and instrument checkouts, trajectory corrections, instrument calibrations, and Pluto encounter rehearsals. This part of the voyage lasts for 8 years and is the current segment of the mission.

The Pluto-Charon encounter is planned for July 14th, 2015.

In the Kuiper Belt, plans are for one or two encounters with Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs). These objects would be in the 40 to 90 kilometer size range and New Horizons would acquire the same data it collected during the Pluto-Charon encounter and send it back to Earth for analysis.

Credits: JHUAPL / SwRI

New Horizons is a small spacecraft. It weighs 478 kilograms in total, of which 77 kilograms is the hydrazine fuel, and 30 kilograms the scientific instruments. It measures 0.7×2.1×2.7 meters.

For communication with Earth, the spacecraft is using a 2.1 meter high-gain antenna. The data transfer rate is 38 kilobits per second at Jupiter, and 0.6 to 1.2 kilobits per second at Pluto. The data gathered during the encounter with Pluto will take 9 months to transmit back to Earth.

The scientific payload of the spacecraft draws less than 28 Watts of power. The mission uses a radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) for power generation. The RTG contains 11 kilograms of plutonium dioxide. At the start of the mission, the RTG provided 240 Watts of energy at 30 Volts. Due to the decay of the plutonium, the power output decreases during the mission, and by the time of the Pluto encounter the RTG will only produce about 200 Watts.

The scientific instruments that were selected meet the mission’s goals. NASA set out a list of things it wanted to know about Pluto: the composition and behavior of the atmosphere, the appearance of the surface, the geological structures on the surface of Pluto, etc. The scientific payload contains seven instruments.

Credits: NASA

Ralph is a visible and infrared imager/spectrometer. It will obtain high-resolution color maps and surface composition maps of the surfaces of Pluto and Charon.

Alice is an ultraviolet imaging spectrometer. It will be used to analyze the composition and the structure of Pluto’s atmosphere and to look for atmospheres around Charon and Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs).

REX is the Radio Science Experiment. It is a passive radiometer that measures atmospheric composition and temperature by using what is called an occultation technique: after passing Pluto, the spacecraft will point its antenna back to Earth and record the transmissions sent by the NASA’s DSN. The alterations of the transmissions caused by Pluto’s atmosphere will be recorded and sent back to Earth for analysis. REX will also be used to measure weak radio emissions from Pluto itself.

LORRI stands for Long Range Reconnaissance Imager. It is a telescopic camera and it will be used to obtain encounter data at long distances, to map Pluto’s far side and to provide high-resolution geologic data. LORRI will take images having 100-meter resolution.

SWAP, the solar wind and plasma spectrometer, stands for Solar Wind Around Pluto. It will measure the atmospheric escape rate and it will observe Pluto’s interaction with solar wind, determining whether Pluto has a magnetosphere or not.

Credits: NASA / JHUAPL

PEPSSI, Pluto Energetic Particle Spectrometer Science Investigation, is an energetic particle spectrometer used to measure the composition and density of plasma (ions) escaping from Pluto’s atmosphere.

SDC is the Student Dust Counter. It is the first scientific instrument built by students mounted on a space probe. It measures the space dust impacting the spacecraft during the voyage across the solar system, recording the count and the size of dust particles. It was built primarily by students from the University of Colorado in Boulder, with supervision from scientists.

If you want to know the present location of the spacecraft, there is a dedicated page on APL that you can visit.

For more information on the New Horizons Mission you can read the New Horizons Missions Guides document on the APL website.

The New Horizons Mission also has a page on Twitter.

Credits: ESA MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS/UPM/
LAM/IAA/RSSD/INTA/UPM/DASP/IDA

On September 6th, 2008, the ESA’s space probe Rosetta performed the first highlight on its 11 year mission: a close flyby the asteroid 2867 Steins. There are two more important events to occur during the mission, which are another flyby the asteroid 21 Lutetia in 2010 and the actual rendezvous with the comet 67/P Churyumov-Gerasimenko in 2014.

The Rosetta mission is special in many ways. It is the first mission to deploy a lander to the surface of a comet. It will also be the first to orbit the nucleus of a comet and to fly alongside a comet as it heads towards the inner Solar System.

Credits: ESA

Rosetta’s mission began on March 2nd, 2004, when the spacecraft lifted off from Kourou, French Guiana. In order to optimize the use of fuel, the probe has a very complicated trajectory to reach its final target, the comet 67/P Churyumov-Gerasimenko. The long trajectory includes three Earth-gravity assists (2004, 2007, and 2009) and one at Mars (2007). The probe uses the gravity wells of Earth and Mars to accelerate to the speed needed for the rendezvous with the comet. Most of the time, the probe is hibernating with the majority of its systems shut down in order to optimize the power consumption. At the time of the rendezvous, the remaining fuel will be used to slow down the probe to match the speed of the comet.

Credits: ESA/AOES Medialab

After reaching the comet, Rosetta will deploy a lander, called Philae, to the surface. While the probe will study the comet’s nucleus from a close orbit, the lander will take measurements from the comet’s surface. Because the gravity of the comet is very weak, the lander will use a harpoon to anchor itself to the surface.

Rosetta will stay with the comet more than one year, and during this time it will study one of the most primitive materials in the solar system. Scientists hope to discover the secrets of the physical and chemical processes that marked the beginning of the solar system some 5 billion years ago.

Credits: ESA/AOES Medialab

Traditionally, probes sent beyond the main asteroid belt employ radioisotope thermal generators (RTGs) as power generators. RTGs convert the heat from a radioactive source into electricity using an array of thermocouples. Instead, Rosetta is using solar cells for power generation. The probe deploys two impressive solar panels (a total area of 64 square meters). Even when close to the comet, the panels will be able to generate around 400 Watts of power. The panels can be rotated through +/- 180 degrees to track the Sun in every attitude assumed by the probe.

The probe is cube-shaped and measures 2.8×2.1×2.0 meters. At launch, it weighs 3,000 kg, including 1,670 kg of fuel, 165 kg of scientific payload for the orbiter, and 100 kg for the lander. The scientific instruments are accommodated on the lower side of the probe, which will be directed towards the comet during the last phase of the mission. Meanwhile, the probe will orbit the nucleus of the comet. A communication antenna 2.2 meters in diameter will be mounted on one side of the probe and on the opposite side the lander is attached. The other two lateral sides are used for anchoring the solar panels.

Credits: ESA/AOES Medialab

I was able to dig up more information about the probe and the lander in the mission launch kit on the EADS Astrium website.

The prime contractor for the spacecraft is Astrium Germany. The main sub-contractors are Astrium UK, Astrium France, and Alenia Spazio.

For propulsion and attitude control, the probe is using 24x10N bipropellant jets. The propulsion system is at the centre of the probe, where the tanks of propellant are located in the centre of a vertical tube.

I could not find an explanation as to why this design was chosen. Since the ability of the spacecraft to maneuver by using the onboard propulsion system is critical, I am assuming that the fuel tanks have to be protected from possible hits by micro meteorites.

Credits: ESA/AOES Medialab

The scientific instruments onboard Rosetta are: OSIRIS (Optical Spectroscopic and Infrared Remote Imaging System), ALICE (Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrometer), VIRTIS (Visible and Infrared Thermal Imaging System), MIRO (Microwave Instrument for Rosetta Orbiter), ROSINA (Rosetta Orbiter Spectrometer for Ion and Neutral Analysis), COSIMA (Cometary Secondary Ion Mass Analyser), MIDAS (Micro-Imaging Dust Analysis System), CONSERT (Comet Nucleus Sounding Experiment by Radiowave Transmission), GIADA (Grain Impact Analyser and Dust Accumulator), RPC (Rosetta Plasma Consortium), and RSI (Radio Science Investigation).

The lander is provided by a European consortium lead by the DLR (German Aeronautic Research Institute). Members of this consortium include ESA and the Austrian, Finnish, French, Hungarian, Irish, Italian, and British institutes.

Credits: ESA/AOES Medialab

The lander has a polygonal carbon fibre sandwich structure which is covered in solar cells. The antenna transmits data from the lander via the probe orbiting the comet.

There is an impressive collection of scientific instruments mounted on the lander as well: COSAC (Cometary Sampling and Composition experiment), MODULUS PTOMELY (Gas analyser), MUPUS (Multi-Purpose Sensors for Surface and Subsurface Science), ROMAP (Rosetta Lander Magnetometer and Plasma Monitor), SESAME (Surface Electrical Seismic and Acoustic Monitoring Experiments), APXS (Alpha X-ray Spectrometer), CONSERT (Comet Nucleus Sounding Experiment by Microwave Transmission), CIVA (Imager system using panoramic cameras), ROLIS (Rosetta Lander Imaging System used during the descend phase), and SD2 (Sample and Distribution Device, a sample acquisition system).

Credits: ESA

The scientific data collected by the instruments is transmitted to the Rosetta Mission Operations Centre (MOC) through a 8bps link. Due to the narrow bandwidth, the data cannot be sent back to Earth in real-time and has to be stored on the probe before being relayed.

The MOC at the European Space Operations Centre (ESOC) in Darmstadt has been controlling this long term mission since launch using ESA’s DSA 1 deep-space ground station at New Norcia.

It may seem like a long journey, but as in The Days of the Comet, the Rosetta mission could open up a whole new world of possibilities.

When I read The Fountains of Paradise a few years ago, I thought the space elevator was an interesting concept but that there was little chance of seeing it materialize like we saw the geostationary satellites become a reality after being depicted in a science fiction story by the same author, Arthur C. Clarke. And not just because some famous scientist said so, but because anchoring to the Earth a geostationary satellite with a cable measuring some 100,000 km is quite a technological challenge.

The first scientist to propose building a structure to reach space was Konstantin Tsiolkovski, who envisioned an orbital tower in 1895. In 1960, another Russian scientist, Yuri Artsutanov, developed this concept into an article called Into Space with the Help of an Electric Locomotive, which was published in Komsomolskaya Pravda. Artsutanov proposed linking of geosynchronous satellites to the ground using cables. It is interesting to mention here that Arthur C. Clarke and Yuri Artsutanov actually met years after the Fountains of Paradise was published.

Ok, so it is just science fiction, you might say. Well, not quite. There was a study ordered by NASA under the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) program, which had as its object the investigation of all aspects of the construction and operation of a space elevator. The study was funded by NASA for more than two years and it was titled The Space Elevator.

A book was also published by the authors of the study, Bradley C. Edwards and Eric A. Westling. The book has the same title as the study. I found the book easy to read and really entertaining. Even if it becomes very technical in some parts, it is accessible to readers who do not have a technical background.

The book starts by presenting the main components of the design (the ribbon, the spacecraft, the climber, and the anchor), and the challenges that the space and the Earth’s atmosphere pose to the space elevator during the deployment phase and during the normal life of the program: lightings, meteors, and LEO objects, just to mention a few.

Being a feasibility study, the economic considerations had to be part of it. There are budget estimates that would draw the attention of potential investors, and even a realistic schedule for the development of not just one, but up to four ribbons.

While the space elevator is obviously a very cheap solution for deploying payloads in Earth’s orbit, it can also be used for opening Mars to human exploration and colonization. An Earth space elevator uploading materials in orbit working together with a space elevator downloading them on Mars would make possible the continuous flow of materials and colonists.

The later chapters of the book present the possible implications of the space elevator on the development of space travel and on the future of our technological society.

As the authors acknowledge, the book is not an exhaustive study of all aspects to be considered in the designing and building of the space elevator, but a good beginning. The proposed budget of 6 to 10 billion dollars for the project is not excessive considering the potential return of investment and that access to space is essential for the future development of our society.

Published in 2003, the book is a classic. I strongly recommend it.

In a follow up to The Space Elevator, Bradley C. Edwards and Philip Ragan wrote Leaving the Planet by Space Elevator, which was published in 2006.

For more information about the space elevator, including the 2008 Space Elevator Challenge and the Elevator: 2010 challenge, check out The Spaceward Foundation’s site.

Credits: ESA

 

In September 2008, the first Automated Transport Vehicle (ATV) mission will come to an end. It is a significant achievement for the European space industry, marking another first in space exploration: the ATV spacecraft is capable of performing rendezvous and docking procedures to the International Space Station (ISS) in a fully autonomous manner. In comparison, the Russian spacecrafts used for carrying supplies and crews to the station (Progress and Soyuz) need the cooperation of the station for docking procedures.

 

The ATV program started back in 1995 and it has so far cost approximately 1.3 billion euros.

 

 

I will start by presenting some of the technical data of the ATV spacecraft. It will not be an exhaustive presentation by far, but I think it is important to have the orders of magnitude at least.

 

Credits: ESA

 

ATV has a mass of almost 21 tonnes (20,750 kg) at launch, of which up to 7 tonnes is on-board propellants and payload. The pressurized cabin section used for cargo storage has 48 cubic meters in volume. ATV is the largest spacecraft ever developed in Europe.

 

In the on orbit configuration, the spacecraft has a length of 9.794 m, maximum diameter of 4.480m, and the solar arrays span of 22.281 m.

 

The launch vehicle used by ATV missions is Ariane 5. The ATV is deployed by the Ariane 5 rocket on a low Earth orbit (260×260 km, inclination 51.6 degrees).

 

Credits: ESA

 

The ATV spacecraft consists of two main modules, the avionics/propulsion module, called the ATV Service Module, and the Integrated Cargo Carrier (ICC), which docks with the International Space Station (ISS).

 

Credits: ESA

 

The ICC represents 60% of the total ATV volume. It is used to deliver two types of supplies to the ISS: the dry cargo (like hardware and personal parcels) and the fluid cargo (like propellant for the ISS’s own propulsion system, water, and gas).

 

Cargo mass can be distributed as follows:
· dry cargo: 1,500 kg – 5,500 kg;
· water: 0 – 840 kg;
· gas (nitrogen, oxygen, air, 2 gases/flight): 0 – 100 kg;
· ISS re-boost and attitude control propellant: 0 – 4,700 kg;
The total cargo upload capacity: 7,667 kg.

 

Credits: ESA

The waste download capacity is 6,340 kg (5,500 kg dry cargo + 840 kg wet cargo).

 

The front of the ICC contains the docking system. The docking system is Russian made and it is a state-of-the-art docking mechanism. It has evolved over the years from the original docking system used for the Salyut space station program in the late 1960s. The docking system enables crew access to the ICC pressurized module, but also provides electrical and propellant connections between the ATV and the ISS.

 

 

In order to make docking a safe procedure, the ICC is equipped with quite an impressive array of sensors and active components: two telegoniometers (used to calculate the distance and direction from ATV to ISS), two videometers (used to compute distance and orientation of the ISS), two star trackers, and two visual video targets (used by the ISS crew to monitor visually the ATV’s final approach).

 

Credits: ESA

The ATV Service Module includes the propulsion systems, the electrical power, computers, the communications, and the avionics.

 

The main propulsion system of the spacecraft is comprised of 4 x 490 N thrusters. The attitude control system relies on 28 x 220 N thrusters. The ATV propulsion system is a pressure fed liquid bi-propellant system using monomethyl hydrazine fuel and nitrogen tetroxide oxidizer. The fuel is pressurized by helium stored in two high pressure tanks.

 

The four solar panels ATV is equipped with can generate 4,800 W on average during the 6 month mission in space.

 

The typical ATV mission starts in French Guiana, at the Kourou launch site. An Ariane 5 rocket deploys the ATV spacecraft on a circular Low Earth Orbit (LEO) at an altitude of 260 km. ATV then activates its navigation systems and fires its thrusters to reach the transfer orbit to the ISS.

 

 

After two or three days, and raising its orbit to 400 km, ATV will be in sight of ISS. It will start the approaching phase of the mission from about 30 km behind and 5 km below the station.

 

Even if the approach and the docking procedures are fully automatic, the flight controllers can at any time call on the spacecraft and back away from the station. The ISS crew can also reject the spacecraft in case any anomalies are noticed.

 

Once the spacecraft is safely docked to the ISS, the station’s crew can access the pressurized cargo section and remove the payload. After the payload is removed, the crew fills the cargo section with used hardware and waste materials.

At intervals of 10 to 14 days, the main thrusters of the ATV will be used to boost the station’s altitude.

Once the mission is accomplished, the ATV separates from the ISS, and performs a controlled and safe destructive re-entry somewhere above the Pacific Ocean.

 

The first ATV mission is called Jules Verne, after the French author Jules Gabriel Verne (1828 – 1905) who pioneered the science-fiction genre.

The Jules Verne ATV had to pass many tests in order to qualify for the mission. An interesting test was the acoustic testing at the ESA’s test facilities in Noordwijk in the Netherlands.

The spacecraft has to withstand the vibrations caused by the extreme noise levels generated during the launch by the Ariane 5 rocket. The ATV was locked in a closed space with huge speakers that simulate the noise levels recorded during an Ariane 5 launch.

 

Credits: ESA

Even though the ATV is able to perform the rendezvous and the docking procedures on its own, the ground control experts from ESA and CNES, the French space agency, were involved in the operations. They determined the route the spacecraft must follow in order to dock with the ISS. The two ISS control centers were also involved in ATV operations: the Mission Control Centre in Moscow and the Mission Control Center in Houston, Texas.

 

 

The Jules Verne mission is the first in a series to come. There are already five ATV missions scheduled between now and 2015. Under the coordination of ESA and the prime contractor EADS Astrium, European engineers have contributed to this new generation spacecraft. Major sub-contractors are Thales Alenia Space (Italy), Astrium (Germany and France), Oerlikon Space (Switzerland), Dutch Space (The Netherlands), with Russian partners providing the advanced docking system.

 

 

The Jules Verne mission liftoff occurred on March 9th, 2008 at 05:03 CET (04:03 UT) at the Kourou Spaceport in French Guiana.

 

ATV Jules Verne had to perform what the media called orbital rehearsals for ISS docking. The initial test, performed on March 14th, demonstrated the Collision Avoidance Manoeuvre (CAM). During this initial test, an automated system took control of the spacecraft and moved it to a safe distance from the ISS.

 

 

The following two tests demonstrated the flying capabilities of the spacecraft in the proximity of the station. On March 29th, ATV manoeuvred around the ISS using relative GPS navigation. Two days later, the ATV tested close proximity manoeuvring and control. The ATV approached first within 20 meters of the station, retreated, then approached even nearer, to only 12 meters from the docking port on the ISS Russian Zvezda module, before again backing off to a safe distance from the station.

 

On April 3rd, 2008 ATV Jules Verne docked to the ISS.

The ATV will undock from the ISS at the beginning of September 2008 and it will complete its mission at the end of September 2008 above the Pacific Ocean.

 

Due to its remarkable capabilities, ATV will serve the ISS for many years and it will become a major player after the Space Shuttle retirement in 2010.

 

There are quite a few ATV evolution scenarios already considered by ESA in the present. To mention here only two of the configurations: the Large Cargo Return (LCR) and the Crew Transport Vehicle (CTV). The LCR configuration presents a large cargo re-entry capsule able to bring back hundreds of kilograms of cargo and valuable experiment results. In the CTV configuration, the Integrated Cargo Carrier component of the spacecraft would be transformed into a manned re-entry capsule for crew transportation. Because of the re-entry capabilities, the CTV could be used as a crew rescue capsule for the ISS.

 

Credits: NASA

Constellation Program is NASA’s new generation space transportation system. It is designed to cover a wide range of space missions, such as delivering supplies and human crews to the International Space Station (ISS) and traveling beyond low Earth orbit (LEO). The goal of the program is to establish a permanent human presence on the Moon and then go to Mars and other destinations.

The Constellation Program promotes exploration, science, commerce, and the United States’ presence in space.

Constellation consists of two launching vehicles (Ares I and Ares V), the Orion spacecraft, the Earth Departure Stage, and the Altair, which is the Lunar Surface Access Module.

Credits: NASA

Ares I is the crew launch vehicle that will be used to deliver the Orion spacecraft to LEO. Ares I is a two stage rocket, 94 m long and 5.5 m in diameter that can deliver a 25,000 kg payload to LEO.

The first stage is a solid rocket booster that evolved from the Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster (SRB). An additional fifth segment was added to the initial SRB design, which enables the rocket to produce more thrust and burn longer. The second stage uses liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen as fuel. The J-2X engine used by the second stage evolved from the J-2 engine used on the Saturn V rocket.

In addition to its primary mission, Ares I can also be used to deliver resources and supplies to the ISS or to park payloads in orbit for retrieval by other spacecraft bound for the Moon or other destinations.

Credits: NASA

Ares V is the cargo launch vehicle of the Constellation Program. Ares V is a two stage rocket, 116 m long and 10 m in diameter. It will be able to deliver a staggering 188,000 kg (188 metric tonnes!) payload into a LEO.

The first stage uses both solid and liquid propulsion (two SRB-derived boosters and 6 RS-68 liquid fueled engines) while the second stage (the Earth Departure Stage) uses a single J-2X engine. It is a versatile launch system and it will be used to carry to LEO cargo and the components needed to go to the Moon and later to Mars.

Both launch vehicles are subject to configuration changes. The images reflect the configuration as of September 2006.

Credits: NASA

Orion is able to carry four to six astronauts. It will provide logistic support to ISS in the first stage. After that, Orion will become an important part of NASA’s human missions to the Moon and Mars.

The conceptual design is similar to the Apollo, but has been improved: an updated digital control system, automated pilot for docking procedures, and a nitrogen/oxygen mixed atmosphere.

The conical form is the safest and most reliable design for re-entering the Earth’s atmosphere. The landing procedure has also been modified: instead of a splash in the Ocean, the module will land on solid ground using a combination of parachutes and airbags.

Credits: NASA

Altair is the lander spacecraft component of the Constellation Program. Like its predecessor, the Apollo Lunar Module, Altair has two stages.

Altair will land all crew members of the lunar mission on the surface of the Moon, while Orion will stay in lunar orbit until the mission ends. The ascending stage brings the crew back on Orion for the journey home.